Wednesday, December 28, 2022

CN Derailment at Grafton, Christmas Eve 2022

That old chestnut of a Christmas song reminds us, "There's no place like home for the holidays", and that "the traffic's just terrific". Except on CN's Kingston Sub...where terrific rhymes with horrific. CN eastbound intermodal No 122 derailed 30 or so cars in the plant at Grafton early on December 24. Stationary CN No 305 from Moncton was side-swiped by some of the derailed, loaded well cars and its lead unit derailed. Media photos show one empty container, its well cars later set out at Cobourg, opened as with a can opener! Grafton is at Mi 256 Kingston Sub, about 8 miles east of Cobourg and 26 miles west of Belleville. (Reddit  screenshot - top photo).

As reported to Transport Canada: CN assignment Q12291-22 was proceeding eastward when 6 intermodal cars derailed and sideswiped lead unit CN 3273 (also derailed) on stationary CN assignment M30511-22 at mile 256.2 Kingston Sub. Cars derailed are as follows: DTTX 743933 (Flammable Liquids, N.O.S. - UN1993), DTTX 759222 (Pyridine - UN1282), DTTX 765233 (Vehicle, Flammable Gas Powered - UN3166), DTTX 732997 (Paint - UN1263), DTTX 53312 (Non-DG load) and DTTX 62377 (Non-DG load).

Mainline derailments are nothing new, and Trackside Treasure has chronicled its share (see labels in sidebar). The complicating effect here was the weather. The "storm of a generation" gave us 36+ hours of snow - "Driftmas" - blowing snow that got everywhere. Whatever the exact causes that led to the derailment, the results garnered national media attention. Delays in the Corridor were significant. VIA mishandled communication and according to some, on-board service. 

The fact that a trackside tree landed atop VIA No 55 just west of Cobourg around 2230 on December 23, reported as Mi 265.3 Kingston Sub (Twitter screenshot - above) didn't help, and it made ALL the national media. Passengers were stranded, missed connections, weren't fed, rebelled, threatened to walk off the train and did. It was the worst of times, it was the best of times as some passengers took it in stride.

The fallen tree on VIA No 55 stranded Nos 69/59/669, with 59 making it into Toronto before noon on December 24 on its own, 69 and 669 joined together near Colborne, heading to Toronto. VIA sent J-train '60/50' tto Cobourg, picking up 55’s passengers for Oshawa. Good news, though - VIA 8122 and tree-landed 4005D were back in service on December 27. VIA P42 900 with its nose damage might take a bit longer, though it was observed back in service around January 5 with still-visible minor nose damage.

As usual, I was spending the morning tracking our buffer car consists and although the usual sources showed trains en route, they were not actually passing. That was due to the derailment, blocking both tracks. VIA finally issued an advisory on its webpage around 1230 December 24 (above), stating all trains were cancelled for Christmas day. And the next day. Finally, on December 26, VIA released a temporary schedule for the 27th. All trains would operate as J-trains, that is two consists joined together. Although this is common on CN's Kingston Sub for trains such as VIA Nos 60/50 and 62/52, this would be ALL trains, eastward and westward.

CN freights had been staged up and down the Montreal and Toronto mainline since the 25th. Some limped into the few online yards, with others tying down where they were. Heavy equipment and crews were brought in. If, humble reader, you are hoping I headed out trackside, perhaps to Grafton, to document this for posterity and freeze off parts of my anatomy off, I'm sorry to disappoint you. I was too busy shovelling, opening gifts, hosting the family, eating lasagna and turkey and all those festive festoon feasting. 

Lots o' links:

While Trackside Treasure is more of a retro blog than an up-to-the-minute blog, I do endeavour to document the Canadian railway scene and on Christmas weekend, this WAS the scene. So on December 27, I was chronicling the aftermath. If I can't go to the derailment, the derailment can come to me - well, sort of.  

Railfans wanted two things: CN to detour over CP, and VIA to run a 'bus-bridge' around the site. CN has removed most if not all of the interchange tracks on its Kingston Sub, i.e. Cobourg and Brighton, though it is possible to so north to Ottawa at Brockville. VIA has not bustituted nor bus-bridged in many years. One previous instance included a bridge between Kingston and points west, which required non-bidirectional consists to be wyed by a dedicated crew at Kingston's Queens wye. None of these options works well during a snowstorm!

Here is the outflow when one track was open at the site - CN freights then J-trains as they made their way down the CN Kingston Sub. I have not kept track of how late each VIA train was, but due to a combination of optimistic scheduling, continued weather-related complications, stocking and station issues, it's fair to say they were all one to five hours late. Trains are shown by time, direction, train number if known, CN engine #'s or VIA consists, and notes, from various sources.

DECEMBER 26

CN 2229-5732-one loaded ingot bulkhead off CN No 305-3149-3273 made its way into Belleville yard. As of January 2, 3273 and 3149 (with a jury-rigged air line down the side handrails) and the bulkhead were still in Belleville yard. The first two engines would power Work 929 west to the derailment site. Another engine and two well cars went to Cobourg. The last two would be taken by CN No 451 to the Ontario Northland shops in North Bay for repair in early January.

  • 2306 EB ?122 2 engines, first train reported through site, north track
  • 2358 EB ?372 23xx

DECEMBER 27

  • 0058 EB ?306 1 engine, north track
  • 0326 EB Probably 120 3 engines
  • 0451 EB Probably 368 30xx, DPU 32xx (CN100), north track
  • 0548 WB intermodal 2 engines (one CN100), ex-Citirail tail-end DPU, south track
  • 0600 EB Probably 148 3 engines
  • 0637 WB ?109/121 ex-Citirail-56xx, north track
  • 0913 WB ?121/109 5620-2263, north track
  • 0950 EB VIA No 60/50: 6426-4LRC-918-8122-4005"(D)&H"-4115D-4116-8129D-Craig Manor
  • 1049 EB VIA No 62/52: 917-6LRC-909-4121-4002D-4119-4110D-4111D-4001D
  • 1128 WB ?377 3811-2980-2325-CP 7057
  • 1147 EB 372 3211
  • 1153 WB 929 5732-2229 with 9 tarped orange ballast hoppers, 5772 not loading
  • 1309 WB No 41/51: 919-8126-4003D-4113D-4106-8105-Bliss Manor-913-4LRC
  • 1324 WB No 63/61: 6437-6LRC-904-4LRC-905
  • 1332 WB 377 2283-2534-4777 including 17 Tank-Train, was stopped at Napanee station
  • 1345 EB VIA No 64/40:6427(L)ove the way-4000D-4008D-4108-4105D-4100-4122-6409-6LRC
  • 1440 WB X369 ex Citirail 3940-3024, set out 2596 at Belleville, tied down train, crew deadhead by taxi to Oshawa to take over M369
  • 1520 WB 105 8919-8822 was recrewed at Napanee
  • 1522 WB VIA No 53/45: 912-5LRC-902-8109D-4009D-4109-4114D-4112D-Drummond Manor, reported ice falling on VIA 4009
  • 1545 WB 121 3894 (CN100)-5662, mid-train DPU 2280, north track
  • 1559 EB 322 BC Rail 4653 (blue), mid-train DPU BC Rail 4646
  • 1630 EB 368 3282-3131
  • 1630 WB 305, 8920-ex Citirail 3916-BCOL 4641 in www scheme, mid-train DPU 8956, recrewed in Belleville, was stopped at Dorval on December 25
  • 1759 WB VIA No 65/67: 6436L-7LRC-9xx-4LRC
  • 1846 EB VIA No 42/44: 64xx-4LRC-64xx-5LRC
  • 1932 WB 383 32xx-57xx, reported as Montreal-Toledo, bypassing MacMillan Yard
  • 1944 WB 321 5775?-5756?
  • Later WB VIA No 47/645: 6437-6 LRC/918-6 HEP last car Craig Manor.
Further J-trains expected into the evening: VIA Nos 47/645, 66/46, 68/54, 48/668. Even though the federal government invested money for triple-tracking, it's amazing how quickly the CN Kingston Sub came to a halt. It's also amazing how little flexibility a segment of single-track leaves rail traffic controllers. Times shown are OS Belleville.

More than two weeks later, VIA CEO Martin Landry issued an apology, part of which reads:


Running extra...

Best wishes for a bright and prosperous 2023 full of health, happiness and dare I say, trains!
--Eric

4 comments:

Michael said...

I guess my annoyance is with the politicians first and foremost. Via did not handle communications well, and for that, it should be reprimanded. But everything else was out of its hands. For a federal politician, in this case the federal transport minister, to scold Via for weather hassles is disgusting. I'm sure Via could return a fair bit of carping over federal support for its services. It reeks of a politician being seen to do something while in fact he's doing nothing.

Eric said...

Politicians gotta politick, Michael - like political photo ops and my personal favourite, announcing new funding when that funding is not actually new money, and had already been announced!

Meanwhile, up in the air, Minister Alghabra is 'concerned' about the airline situation which has affected more people negatively than the VIA situation!

Thanks for your comment,
Eric

Shane Stewart said...

Happy New Year Eric.

Eric said...

Thnks, Shane. Same to you - hoping you have a great 2023 ahead!
Eric