What do you do when you have a ship, a dock, and a track, and you have a need for a dwarfish shifter? You go dockside and find a Dockside! The real Docksides – four C-16 switchers built in 1912 by Baldwin for the B&O – derived their nickname from draying and dragging freight cars on the docksides of the port of Baltimore. They were built to navigate tight waterfront curves, doing the job deliberately until the early 1950s. Let's dress the stage with an industrial tank engine in Lynchburg, VA captioned 1948 from an online auction site photo:
Model Docksides, also called “Little Joes,” earned their fame in scale model railroading, following Varney’s original die-cast metal HO model. During a seven decades-long production period, hundreds of thousands of these undecorative diminutive switchers were produced in HO for discrete individual sale, as well as starter train sets and declivitously decanted onto layouts. As such, the Dockside dramatically influenced the draw of the scale in its formative years. Varney's took the dive into an initial 1941 introduction of a 1:87 die-cast metal kit of the Dockside, drawing in later renderings done in brass/metal by Pacific Fast Mail-Sakura and Gem Models, certainly describing an important arc in building the 0-4-0 tank engine’s stature during the early days of HO gauge. In the mid-1950s, other manufacturers dedicated themselves to the Dockside: AHM, IHC Hobby, Life-Like, Pemco, Revell, and Rivarossi, latterly Playart and Lima.
My two (top photo) Rivarossi and Mantua 0-4-0T Docksides, not to be confused with the saddle-tank 0-4-0T, the teapot/cow-catcher red, white & blue Spirit of '76 version, the 0-6-0, the 0-4-0 Shifter....the list goes on. These basic 0-4-0T's came ready-to-run and featured an injection-molded shell mounted on a die-cast metal chassis. Wire-formed handrail installed along the boiler and the metal side rods themselves were the only separately applied details included. Modellers seem to have a soft spot for all versions!
I really like the Rivarossi one on the left, though it is non-working. It makes a good flatcar load from my Canadian Locomotive Co. plant, located on Kingston's waterfront. A train-show find. I like the heavier appearance of it, the full length wrap-around boiler, the painted cab windows and all-weather cab, and the overall paint and weathering. The lack of adequate blocking and securement should not worry the HO scale car inspector - this was a proof-of-concept only:
I could watch my Mantua version run ALL DAY and I'm not the only one. Sound and a decoder, anyone? Unencumbered by pony trucks, trailing trucks, or many axles at all, their amply energetic motor allowed the HO scale version to operate at many times the speed of the prototype. The latter was likely around 5 mph most of the time! Here's my version...a once-around of my Kingston's Hanley Spur layout - at speed!
A somewhat-recent March discussion with blog partner Chris Mears about this diminutive Dockside, this petite power-plant got me searching for an early photo of the Dockside in use on my Cataraqui Northern Lines layout in my teen years (Engine, Engine Number 9 per the front round number plate). It was already on the roster by 1974, perhaps not by much! Here it is shifting a Penn Central boxcar, with B&M and [scratchbuilt by my Dad] P&LE gondola cars. A road freight with Del Monte (!) reefer, tank cars and BN boxcars passes the vintage cardboard background that is still in my collection:
The drive system/axles of both can been seen in this underside view. Note the lettering 'R R Italy' Rivarossi and rear-axle drive (top). My Mantua (bottom) has front-axle drive:
You can see the stencilled NYC lettering wearing off from being handled many, many times.
Other than a flatcar load, I don't anticipate Dockside operation on my HO scale Hanley Spur layout anytime soon. But it will always have a place in my personal pantheon of model railway motive power!
Running extra...
Border crossings are down, floor crossings are up! Political wags' tongues are wagging as the drip, drip, drip continues. My understanding is that it's a legitimate and long-standing parliamentary tradition and the right of Members of Parliament. Voting against party lines may lead to consequences such as losing a position (e.g., as minister or a portfolio critic) or being ejected from the party caucus, so whaddya gonna do? If you, fellow Canadians, feel strongly against it, feel free to sign this petition. Just don't ask me why the default address came up as 'Oman'. As in, "Oh man, not another floor crossing!"? Spoiler alert - the petition was launched by a Conservative MP!
The Indians say Aaya Ram Gaya Ram and Winston Churchill might have said, "We shall fight them on the benches...", because he apparently crossed the Mother of All Parliament's carpet it twice. (From an east to a 'West minister'?) Alberta Premier Danielle Smith did it. She may one day become one of the few floor crossers and border crossers. Speaking of misguided Albertans, one said he would be happy if Quebec separated because it would not take as long to reach Newfoundland.
I've mused before about completely changing direction and rearranging the blog furniture here. How about a political blog called The Silent Majority, or one on floor-crossing called Right This Way, Left That Way, or That's Very Genereux of You? A blog about Canada's oldest person - a 110 year-old left us this past week - called I Centenarian You An Email? One on pottery called Feet of Clay - I just watched a CBS News story on a 102 year-old hairy potter. One on Who Was Stephen Colbert's Latest Guest...oh, never mind.
First past the post...
Quote of the week goes to The Toronto Star's National columnist Althia Raj on CBC re: the lack of any real challenger to Pierre Poilievre's leadership: "The Conservative caucus is kind of like butter knives out", only spreading discontent.






















































