THREE IMPORTANT DATES FOR ONE TRAINSET
Here are a few significant dates from this third VIA Ventures in Service post:
June 3: VIA operated train No 631-03 comprising Set 12 with two cars (one Economy Class and one Business Class) taken from Set 7, Montreal-Ottawa return. This is the first known remarshalling of a Venture set, and perhaps the most sensible way to meet CN's 32-axle minimum requirement in order to operate without crossing speed reductions! Consist: 2311-2811-2911-2906 (Set 7 coach)-2706 (Set 7 Business Class)-2711-2611-2211. (Top photo taken at Caron/Mile 19.21 Kingston Sub on June 3, 2025. I'm indebted to Lion Liu for sharing all the photos in this post.) The augmented trainset looks remarkably similar to a regular six-unit trainset, but requires coach-counting using fingers on both hands.)
Then this happened...
July 14 - Augmented Set 12 operated as Nos 67-79. The first use of this set since its June 3 test. The 'ajoutay' consist left the MMC on-time, but inexplicably departed Central Station 28 minutes late. Thereafter, with its CN-approved axle count and track speed, it only lost another 17 minutes all the way to Toronto, arriving only (!) 45 minutes late. VIA sources suggest that the use of the augmented consist on July 14 was a game-day decision.
The initial consist was reportedly augmented as early as May 22, 2025, comprising Set 12 with two cars (one Economy Class and one Business Class) taken from Set 7: 2311-2811-2911-2906 (Set 7 coach)-2706 (Set 7 Business Class)-2711-2611-2211.
(I'm considering using term 'ajoutay' for such consists, just as I use the term 'doublavay' to represent J-trained Venture consists. Not only do both applications of Venture trainsets deserve their own Venture-specific terms, but both are marginally bilingual!) VIA is referring to this set in internal documents as "1-7 V", instead of the regular "V" denoting a Venture set. Some VIA fans use the term "XL".
A fellow rail enthusiast, usually unheard-from, just couldn't take it anymore! I'll call him Nomenclature Norman.
The third business class car (2706 for 'ajoutay' Set 12 and 2724 for 'ajoutay' Set 24) can apparently be sold in either Business (car line 91) or Economy (car line 9) Class whenever needed.
Some have expressed concerns about whether the Ventures were ever intended to operate in variable-length consists, despite many quoting the 'NGEC' PowerPoint that shows 3-, 5- and 7-car consists. Unlike hitching up steam lines and air lines on a bunch of steam-heated coaches at Spadina or Pointe St Charles and you're good-to-go, there are lots of 'black boxes' on Ventures that have to operate throughout a train with any number of cars. Each car, for instance, has its own interior and exterior signage that is constantly updated. There would also be sensors, status lights, HVAC, light and power and many more systems that are controlled from one point then throughout the consist.
There is only one important number right now. It's not the number of minutes late, the number of passengers sick of arriving late and fleeing VIA, it's the number of axles CN is forcing VIA to run its Venture-equipped trains with. Or else. The magic number is 32! With a standard, six-unit Venture totalling 24 axles, the additional two cars add the requisite eight axles.
So, 24 + 8 = success!
THE VENTURES' ANNUS HORRIBILIS
Let's look at the VIAriety of terrible, negative punishment that VIA's image and internal morale has taken over the past nine months, perhaps more precisely a novem menses horribilis!
- the overnight introduction of the completely-unexpected and unprecedented CN Crossing Supplement as an over-reach, over-reaction and technically groundless weapon against VIA.
- the thousands and thousands of hours that lawyers spent crafting a legal strategy to battle CN, collecting affidavits and sifting through the previous three years of communication with CN.
- the crushing blow that the jurisdictional argument dealt to VIA's case, not even getting a hearing in Federal Court in Montreal.
- VIA shifting the case from Federal Court to Superior Court in Quebec, in which its interlocutory injunction was not only denied but then upheld on appeal.
- both court cases pointing to VIA's case against CN not being a legal issue, not even a commercial contract issue, but a regulatory issue that needs to be not solved by the courts but by the Federal regulator.
- Transport Canada's intransigence and foot-dragging as a regulator, now six months of inaction even after CN supplied requested crossing signal data.
- the resulting fall-out from CN's actions dealing huge blows to VIA's ridership, reliability, public perception, on-time performance and public image.
- VIA's apparent reticence to name CN as an aggressor, instead having to politely refer vaguely to the 'infrastucture operator/host railway' due to its inability to advocate for itself.
- the extent to which CN's crossing speed reductions has hampered VIA's Venture roll-out.
TRACKSIDE PROGNOSTICATOR
In this initial post on the CN-imposed speed reductions that was not only published in real-time in October, 2024 as we tried to figure out the what and why, but has also been maintained each Monday with Venture-equipped trains' on-time performance as a way of ensuring that we don't miss the timely demise of said reductions, I predicted the following solutions:
- probable SHORT-TERM SOLUTION: Continued speed restrictions at affected crossings causing Venture trains to operate at the 30-60 minute late range.
- probable MEDIUM-TERM SOLUTION: Lengthening Venture consists with unused Venture cars.
- probable LONG-TERM SOLUTION: Shunt-enhancer installation on Venture sets.
- cancelling certain perpetually-late Venture trains caused by late arrivals on the previous leg.
- making near-daily Nos 60/50 and 62/52 'doublavays' as far as Brockville, resulting in far improved on-time performance at Montreal and Ottawa, respectively.
- experimenting with other 'doublavay' trainsets elsewhere in the Corridor
- shifting Ventures away from early-morning 'commuter' runs like Ottawa-Toronto Nos 641 and 41.
- temporarily pausing implementation of Ventures to South-West Ontario, before reintroducing Ventures to Toronto-Sarnia train Nos 84-87 and now sparingly to Windsor.
- stationing readily-available guard consists at the TMC and MMC to replace last-minute problematic trainsets prior to departure.
- 2021 - 1 trainset delivered
- 2022 - 1 trainset delivered - 1 in revenue service of 2 available
- 2023 - 9 trainsets delivered - 6 in revenue service of 11 available
- 2024 - 14 trainsets delivered - 14 in revenue service of 25 available
- 2025 - as of July, 7 trainsets delivered - 13 in revenue service of 31 available
- How will 'ajoutay' consists affect the use of VIA's maintenance centres in Montreal and Toronto that are apparently designed to only handle the as-delivered six-unit consists, not these eight-unit consists.
- What will the impact be of additional 'ajoutay' consists on VIA's Venture fleet utilization and availability on the whole?
8 comments:
VIA should get as many Venture sets, with enough cars to meet CN's requirements, running as soon as possible. Also, Via trains should always have priority. The U.S has the same issue with priority and CN. In closing, Joan and I had a nice trip on 15 July from Montreal to Toronto on 65 in LRC Business Class. We were ten minutes late until Oshawa when GO pulled priority. Both station and train staff were outstanding, but the cars are showing their age which is to be expected. Thanks for another great report, Eric.
Agreeing with your sentiment, Joseph, about Ventures entering service. I think CN honestly does their best at the RTC level to expedite VIA, though I understand GO/Metrolinx is more of a harsh host. It's at the corporate level that there seems to be misplaced ill-will against VIA from CN.
Glad to hear you had a good trip and thanks for your kind words about this hot-off-the-press post!
Thanks,
Eric
Some other factors involved in this.
Extra cars -> extra axles may make CN happy, but it increases VIA's costs as you are now hauling extra unnecessary weight around (and selling those extra seats will likely reduce revenue if you assume VIA has the existing sets about right in terms of demand)
VIA is already in the process of getting a lot of extra money from the government for the replacement of the long distance and regional fleets
Related to the above, but also impacting any extra Venture coaches, the optics of giving a contract and money to a US based supplier given the current trade issues.
Agreed to all your points, A. I haven't been able to ascertain whether 'ajoutay' consists' extra cars' space will be sold. I assume so, although station stops will have to be adjusted, which cars' doors are opened etc. I would just like to see the consists formed and operating first, then worry about selling the space. I'd much rather see them arrive on time than 100% sold!
Those who say 'buy more cars' just aren't realizing the complexity of that simple wish these days. I think the American supplier thing can be worked around because - as in many industries - we have become lazy as a country when it comes to procurement. Having said that, there are just not a lot of North American manufacturers capable anyway.
Thanks for your comments!
Eric
Train 79 to Windsor is running today with a 7-coach Venture, so it seems the experiment keeps going.
Thanks for that additional information, Domingo!
Eric
Hello Eric,
I noticed in this post you mentioned that today (July 25), Set 12 was operating as VIA #79, which was forced to detour via Stratford. I would like to add, it very likely also operated as #72 from Windsor to Toronto today. I saw an eastbound 7-car Venture pulled by locomotive 2211 at Bramalea GO at 4 PM today, which was probably Set 12 on train #72.
(side note: Thank you for your informative and well-researched blog posts! I am also cautiously hopeful that VIA may continue with lengthening trainsets to get around CN's crippling speed restrictions.)
Thanks very much for that additional information, A. Your observation jives with the arrival time of No 72 at Toronto Union, that was 3 hrs 19 minutes late!
I share your optimism about this potential solution. Seems to be working well, though largely unremarked, except here on Trackside Treasure where readers like you are working hard to document this little success story!
Thanks for your comment,
Eric
Post a Comment